Tomorrow’s midterm elections have significant implications for federal science policy. Democrats, buoyed by polling indicating they’ll at least gain control of the House, plan to investigate grant terminations and leadership conduct at the Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, and other federal science agencies. That said, some observers caution that lawmakers possess limited tools to reverse Trump administration policies, which have led to heavy losses of agency scientists and grant terminations. Several prominent appropriators with power over science agency budgets are up for reelection, as are their counterparts on the authorizing committees that oversee those agencies.
The election’s outcome will set the tone for the remainder of 2026. Congress returns from a month-long recess on Nov. 9. Most federal funding expires on Dec. 12, meaning the current Congress will need to pass some form of spending legislation before then or face a government shutdown. Another open question is whether Congress will continue to block the implementation of a controversial Office of Management and Budget rule that would give White House political appointees direct authority over federal grantmaking decisions. Any bills not passed before the new Congress arrives in January will expire, putting pressure on their backers to get them across the line before the end of the year.
NSF walks back changes based on OMB proposal
For now, the National Science Foundation will not align its grant decisions with a proposed Office of Management and Budget rule, agency documents show. NSF updated its proposed grant policy changes based on more than 3,000 public comments. The new version removes language based solely on the OMB’s proposed rule, which would have eliminated fixed-price awards, disallowed publication costs, allowed for termination of grants for convenience, and suggested that indirect-cost recovery is subject to availability of funds. NSF also “reiterates that it will continue to follow its established merit-review process,” the response to comments states. It also says the agency will address future changes to the Uniform Guidance after final government-wide requirements are issued.
NSF originally proposed the changes in June to align with OMB’s proposed rule. The October update follows massive pushback from scientists and lawmakers against the OMB proposal, including Congress pausing the proposal until Dec. 11 in a recent stopgap funding bill.
NSF’s current proposal is now under a 30-day review by the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. The office can approve the proposal or decide that the agency has not adequately addressed public comments. After OIRA approval, the agency may finalize the rule immediately. NSF’s changes would only apply to new awards or new funding for existing awards. The agency “will allow sufficient time” between the publication and implementation of the new policy so proposers and recipients can sufficiently implement necessary changes, the response to comments states.
Tech-heavy PCAST convenes inaugural meeting
The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology will hold its first meeting of the second Trump administration on Friday. Rechartered in 2025 to advise the president on “science, technology, education, and innovation,” the panel now largely seats technology industry leaders, such as Oracle’s David Ellison and Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg. Historically, PCAST and its predecessors largely consisted of academic and industry researchers. Venture capitalist David Sack and OSTP director Michael Kratsios, who co-chair the panel, have stressed an anticipated role in advising on emerging technologies.
President Trump awarded National Medals of Science to three PCAST members, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, Alphabet’s Sergey Brin, and AMD’s Lisa Su, as well as a National Medal of Technology and Innovation to member Michael Dell, at an October “Science: A New Golden Age” summit. National Medals of Science more typically went to prominent figures in fundamental research in past administrations.
Historically, PCAST members have advised presidents on emerging scientific and technological issues. The group produced reports on topics such as STEM education and artificial intelligence during the Biden administration. The panel has not published any reports so far during the Trump administration.
Also on our radar
The White House directed DOGE grant cuts at NSF, according to public records reported by FedScoop. Florida’s gubernatorial office was also mentioned in some grant termination decisions.
AGU launched an “Initiative for Science Assessments” to broadly support scientific reviews on matters of public interest. AGU previously launched initiatives to support the National Climate Assessment and the Arctic Report Card, two scientific assessments that lost federal support under the Trump administration.
A scientific and university coalition asked NASA to rescind grant policy changes that “preemptively” follow the OMB proposed rule on grantmaking and to disburse grant funds “in a timely and predictable manner.” (The coalition includes AIP Member Societies.)
A Planetary Society report finds that low-cost NASA Science missions produce less science per dollar and fail more often than costlier efforts. Meanwhile, the report notes that the space agency says it is moving to smaller, higher-risk, commercially supported science missions.
NIST published post-quantum cryptography guidance for federal agencies. The guidance maps out agency transitions to new encryption algorithms ahead of a 2031 deadline.
The Federal Labor Relations Authority dismissed an NIH petition to decertify its early-career research fellows union.
FCC commissioners approved two spectrum proposals for publication in the Federal Register. Experts warn the proposals could disrupt astronomy and weather satellite data. The administration plans to auction up to 400 megahertz of spectrum by 2028.
NSF has begun searching for an inaugural head of its new Office of Metascience. The office will experiment with the agency’s research funding vehicles to improve research outcomes.
Former NOAA officials say the dramatic changes increase the risk of data loss and will degrade the agency’s satellite capabilities.
Upcoming Events
All events are Eastern Time unless otherwise noted. Listings do not imply endorsement. Events beyond this week are listed on our website.
The House and Senate are in recess and will return Nov. 9.
On Monday, Nov. 16, AIP will host a public “Science After the Midterms” webinar exploring how the Congressional transition will shape the federal research agenda. Designed for a general scientific audience, the program will focus on pending legislation and lawmaker engagement considerations. It will conclude with an extended audience Q&A. Click here to register.
Know of an opportunity for scientists to engage in science policy? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Do you have a story to tell about how science policy is impacting you?
AIP’s research team is gathering first-hand accounts from scientists, engineers, students, and staff whose careers have been affected by policy and funding changes over the past year. Volunteers can submit their stories via this online form. Participants’ stories will be added to the Niels Bohr Library & Archives digital repository as searchable, citable records — with options for anonymity and a five-year embargo period. Read more about the initiative here.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.