\
The Parker Solar Probe undergoing its final assembly prior to its launch in 2018.
Glenn Benson / NASA.
In December, we discussed the history of the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy, or SOFIA, to highlight the tension in science between an ideal of perseverance in the face of obstacles and the reality of competing scientific interests and limited resources. In the case of SOFIA, the costs proved too high to justify continuing to operate the telescope. This week, we turn our attention to NASA’s Parker Solar Probe, a story of the successful perseverance of an idea across generations, until technology, resources, and other factors aligned in its favor.
The origins of the solar probe concept
On April 5, 1950, physicist James Van Allen hosted a dinner at his home in Maryland for geophysicist Sydney Chapman, who had stopped over on his way from Britain to a meeting at Caltech on upper-atmosphere research. Over dinner, the attendees—Van Allen and his wife, Chapman, Lloyd Berkner, J. Wallace Joyce, Ernest Vestine, and Fred Singer—came up with the idea for a global program of research on topics related to the Earth and its environs.
During the discussion, Chapman suggested that 1957-58 would be an ideal time for the program, as it would coincide with the period of maximum activity in the solar cycle. Chapman took this idea to the meeting at Caltech, and from there it percolated up all the way to the International Council of Scientific Unions, where the project was officially dubbed the International Geophysical Year, and organizing meetings began in 1953.
The emphasis on solar activity as a cornerstone of the IGY that Chapman articulated over that first dinner persisted. The United States National Committee for the IGY released an outline
As part of the preparation for the IGY, the national committee created the Space Science Board of the National Academy of Sciences to consider the scientific opportunities of the human exploration of space, as well as to provide advice on IGY projects and, later, to advise NASA, the Department of Defense, and the National Science Foundation on matters related to human spaceflight and space research.
In 1958, the board set up a committee on the “Physics of Fields and Particles in Space,” chaired by John Simpson and co-chaired by Van Allen. It soon released a report that included as “long-range plans” seemingly far-fetched missions, including a lunar satellite and base, nuclear detonations in space, and a probe that could approach the Sun itself.
While the proposal for a Moon base never came to be, the military conducted
The prospective mission presented unique challenges, particularly the intense heat and radiation of the near-solar environment. By 1978, work had progressed to the point that researchers could start looking beyond feasibility studies and begin fleshing out how the mission could work and the kinds of scientific investigations it would allow.
Meetings held at JPL that year identified a number of avenues for inquiry
A “strawman design” for the solar probe concept.
From James E. Randolph, “Solar Probe Study,” in A Close-Up of the Sun, edited by M. Neugebauer and R. W. Davies, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, September 1, 1978.
A new century and new momentum
Budgetary constraints and shifts in priorities at NASA kept the ideas put forward in the 1978 reports on the back burner. In the mid-1990s, the solar probe idea was integrated into a joint program with Russia called “Fire and Ice” that would explore the Sun and Pluto. But it was in 1998 that plans for the solar probe project began to move forward in earnest when NASA bundled it with a mission to orbit Jupiter’s moon Europa and a mission to Pluto and the Kuiper Belt in what was called the Outer Planets / Solar Probe Project (OPSP).
In 2001, the OPSP concept was dissolved and the solar probe shifted into a new program called “Living With a Star,” which by the end of the decade was integrated into a new Heliophysics Division that continues to be the focal point for NASA’s work on the Sun and its interactions with the Earth and the rest of the solar system. NASA also commissioned a new concept study for the mission from the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, which became responsible for the spacecraft’s development.
The probe received a boost in 2003, when the first-ever National Research Council decadal survey
Given the probe’s expense, in 2007 NASA instituted new restrictions, requiring the total mission cost to come in under $750 million, with a mission duration of no longer than ten years. Moreover, the spacecraft would have to use solar panels rather than a scarce radioisotope power source.
This concept, known as “Solar Probe Lite,” presented challenges related to the fact that the energy cost to escape Earth’s orbit to move toward the Sun is far higher than breaking away. The proposed solution had been to send the probe outward and to use a gravity assist from Jupiter to swing it inward. However, at Jupiter, solar panels are inefficient, meaning a radioisotope source would be required. To preserve the scientific mission under the new parameters, the project scientists devised a new trajectory that would use multiple gravity assists from Venus instead.
This new concept
The formulation and development costs of the probe ultimately totaled to around $1.3 billion, but the mission launched on time on August 12, 2018. In 2017, the spacecraft was renamed after solar physicist Eugene Parker, who published foundational work in the 1950s predicting the existence of the solar wind. The honor was an unusual one in that Parker was still alive at that time, and he was the first person to witness the launch of a spacecraft bearing their name.
On April 28, 2021, the Parker Solar Probe’s trajectory brought it into the solar atmosphere, an event NASA celebrated by announcing,
Jon Phillips
American Institute of Physics
jphillips@aip.org
Sign up to receive the Weekly Edition and other AIP newsletters by email here.