House proposes small boost to Department of Energy science funding
House appropriators released their Energy-Water bill last week, which includes a modest funding boost for research. The bill was advanced by its subcommittee on Friday and will be considered by the full appropriations committee on Wednesday. The bill would provide $8.5 billion for the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, a 1% increase that contrasts with the 15% cut proposed by the White House. Detailed, program-level numbers are not yet available. However, a summary released alongside the bill says it would increase funding for AI and quantum research at the Office of Science in support of the Genesis Mission. It also promises boosts to fusion energy science, experimental user facilities, and the national labs. The bill would provide $27 billion for the National Nuclear Security Administration, a 6.6% increase that still falls well short of the $32.8 billion requested by the White House. The bill proposes a 40% cut to DOE’s Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation Office (formerly Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy), reducing its budget from $3.1 billion to $1.85 billion, while the White House would cut the office to $1.1 billion. The bill proposes flat or nearly flat funding for DOE’s Nuclear Energy, Electricity, and Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy offices. It proposes $300 million for the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy, a cut of $50 million. Ranking Democrats on both the Appropriations Committee and the subcommittee criticized the bill, highlighting its proposed cuts to CMEI, radioactive waste clean-up programs, and NNSA’s nonproliferation account.
Republicans raise research security concerns over CCP collaboration
Republicans in Congress made several moves last week to elevate their concerns about U.S. scientific collaboration with China. Republicans on the House CCP Committee introduced legislation that aims to further restrict U.S.-funded scientists from collaborating with Chinese entities. That committee also released a report identifying hundreds of cases in which NASA “potentially” violated a ban on bilateral research with China. Republicans on the House Education and Workforce Committee sent a letter to nine U.S. universities demanding information on “attempts by foreign entities aligned with the CCP and other adversaries to influence American universities.” Beyond Congress, Science reported last week that Trump’s recent firing of the National Science Board killed the publication of an essay that would have argued the U.S. is already behind China in several key scientific fields and that the U.S. will fall further behind without significantly increasing its spending on research.
Readouts from President Donald Trump’s state visit to China last week indicate research policy was largely absent from his discussions with China’s leader, Xi Jinping. The two leaders discussed several adjacent issues, such as AI regulations and export controls, but no concrete agreements were announced.
CBO’s Golden Dome estimate tops one trillion
The Congressional Budget Office recently published a report estimating that President Donald Trump’s Golden Dome plans will cost about $1.2 trillion to develop, deploy, and operate for 20 years. The CBO estimates acquisition costs for the system could total just over $1 trillion, 70% of which would be spent on the space-based interceptor layer. In recent public statements, the director of the Office of Golden Dome for America has estimated that the program will cost around $185 billion to deploy over the next decade, while President Trump’s 2027 budget request calls for the Golden Dome for America fund to receive around $15 billion per year for the next five years — both much lower than the CBO’s estimate.
Energy Secretary does not rule out explosive nuclear testing
Energy Secretary Chris Wright refused to rule out explosive nuclear testing in comments to Congress last week, stating that the decision is President Donald Trump’s to make. Wright did say, however, that “there is not a need for explosive testing” to assure the reliability of the weapons he oversees. The comments came at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, where senators pressed the secretary to explain his stance on nuclear testing. “This year again, the leaders of the weapons laboratories and the Stratcom commander again certified our weapon stockpile as reliable from the non-explosive testing we do. I think our arsenal is ready to go,” Wright said, adding, “but there may be other reasons for which the Commander-in-Chief may want to engage in a nuclear test.”
President Trump last year called for the U.S. to conduct nuclear testing on an “equal basis” with other countries — a comment that was widely interpreted to mean he wanted the U.S. to resume explosive nuclear tests at the Nevada National Security Site. The U.S. has not conducted explosive nuclear tests since the early 90s.
Also on our radar
The House Appropriations Committee advanced its spending bill covering NSF, NASA, NOAA, and NIST, and published the accompanying report with more detailed proposals.
The Senate is scheduled to vote today on Arvind Raman’s nomination to be NIST director.
DOE is inviting proposals on robotics and automation testbeds for scientific discovery. Teams must be led by a national lab and have “substantive” industry participation. DOE also issued a call last week for experts to review Genesis Mission funding applications.
DOE is creating a critical minerals research hub in Oregon, a top agency official said last week.
NSF has opened proposals for its X-Labs initiative, previously called Tech Labs, for two topics: quantum systems and scientific instrumentation for sensing and imaging. Proposals are due in July.
House Science Republicans requested a briefing from the EPA on “foreign influence” in U.S. rulemaking, specifically regarding the use of the greenhouse gas protocol.
House and Senate Democrats wrote separate letters to Trump on the firing of the National Science Board. The House letter demands that the fired board members be reinstated, while the Senate letter requests information on how NSF will approve major spending and the plan to appoint new members.
DHS investigations have identified more than 10,000 cases of potential fraud associated with the Optional Practical Training program that allows foreign students to extend their stay post-graduation.
Your support keeps our community informed on the latest science policy news.
Know of an opportunity for scientists to engage in science policy? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Do you have a story to tell about how science policy is impacting you?
AIP’s research team is gathering first-hand accounts from scientists, engineers, students, and staff whose careers have been affected by policy and funding changes over the past year. Volunteers can submit their stories via this online form. Participants’ stories will be added to the Niels Bohr Library & Archives digital repository as searchable, citable records — with options for anonymity and a five-year embargo period. Read more about the initiative here.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.
The Trump administration’s latest budget request proposes canceling federal subscriptions to academic journals and banning the use of federal funds to cover publishing costs.