President Donald Trump holds a cabinet meeting in January.
Molly Riley/White House
Federal agencies look to add anti-DEI contract requirements
Federal agencies are moving to implement a March executive order blocking federal contractors from engaging in diversity, equity, and inclusion activities. The agencies are seeking comment on the proposed contract language put forth in the executive order, which states that contractors will “not engage in any racially discriminatory DEI activities” and requires contractors to provide any information the agency requests to assess compliance. It would also make contractors responsible for ensuring their subcontractors’ compliance. The comment period closes on July 6, after which the agencies may issue a rule implementing the proposed contract language. The Trump administration has made clear its intent to end DEI activities across the federal government, which the order says are inefficient, unethical, and illegal. A coalition of higher education and trade associations filed a lawsuit against Trump’s executive order on April 20. The lawsuit argues that the order unlawfully equates DEI with racial discrimination and violates the First Amendment. The Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council published implementation guidance on the order on April 17, including a very fast implementation timeline that states that all agencies should aim to modify their existing contracts to include the new contract language by July 24.
National Academies scientists decry NSF board firings to Congress
Over one thousand members of the National Academies signed an open letter asking Congress to call for the reinstatement of the 22 National Science Board members that the White House fired in late April. “This dismantling of a critical national advisory body is but one of many such actions taken by the current administration that deprives our government of independent, apolitical, oversight and expert advice,” the letter states. The letter also calls for the appointment of new members, who must be “eminent” in science-related fields and chosen “solely on the basis of established records of distinguished service,” to fill board seats that were vacant at the time of the firing. Stand Up for Science and other science-related organizations have endorsed the letter. The presidents of the National Academies issued a separate statement two weeks ago that praised NSB as a “cornerstone” of U.S. success but did not comment on the dismissal of its members.
House to release Energy-Water funding proposal
The House Appropriations Committee will release its Energy and Water Development bill ahead of its subcommittee bill markup on Friday. The bill covers the Department of Energy, including the National Nuclear Security Administration. The full committee is scheduled to mark up the bill next week. Energy and Water Development Subcommittee Ranking Member Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) criticized the proposed $1.1 billion (13%) cut to the Office of Science at an April hearing on DOE’s budget request. The request also proposes a 54% cut to biological and environmental research and $1.2 billion, not counted in the agency topline, to support three new AI supercomputers at DOE national labs. For NNSA, the agency proposes a 12% increase (over total fiscal year 2026 funding, which includes funds from the reconciliation bill enacted in July).
The House has so far released its Commerce-Justice-Science bill, which proposes cuts for most of the science agencies it covers, though they are not as deep as the president’s proposed cuts. The House Appropriations Committee will host a full markup of the CJS bill on Wednesday. The committee has published the bill text, but not the bill report, which will provide more details on the House’s funding priorities. The bills for the Defense Department and the Interior Department are forthcoming.
Also on our radar
A USDA policy released in April restricts agency-funded research from being published in journals that use “predatory practices” or whose publisher has ties to “a foreign country of concern.”
Last week, NIST issued, then pulled, an announcement of new deals with Google, Microsoft, and xAI to evaluate AI models before they are publicly released. A NIST spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
NASA announced Brian Hughes as senior director of launch operations, a new role that will oversee launch operations at Kennedy Space Center in Florida and Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. Before this, Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland had operated the Wallops facility. House Science Democrats said Hughes “personally directed the agency’s illegal implementation of the White House budget last year” and previously raised concerns about building closures at Goddard.
A GAO report projects that DOE will finish “nearly all” cleanup work of four radioactive contamination sites “decades faster” and for $4.8 billion less than the baseline estimate.
House CCP Committee Chair John Moolenaar (R-MI) praised NSF for tightening research security measures in its advanced cyberinfrastructure program ACCESS. In January, Moolenaar asked NSF to revoke access to the program “for all Chinese entities.”
House Science Committee Ranking Member Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) asked GAO to examine NSF’s information collection on national STEM workforce needs.
The House Armed Services Committee rescheduled a hearing on DOD science, technology, and innovation to this Thursday.
Further review of the Trump administration’s FY27 budget request will take place this week in the Senate and the House, including reviews of the DOD, Air Force, Navy, Department of the Interior, FDA, and EPA proposals. The Senate Armed Services Committee will also review DOE and NNSA’s atomic energy defense activities. (See the events calendar below for links)
Your support keeps our community informed on the latest science policy news.
Know of an opportunity for scientists to engage in science policy? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Do you have a story to tell about how science policy is impacting you?
AIP’s research team is gathering first-hand accounts from scientists, engineers, students, and staff whose careers have been affected by policy and funding changes over the past year. Volunteers can submit their stories via this online form. Participants’ stories will be added to the Niels Bohr Library & Archives digital repository as searchable, citable records — with options for anonymity and a five-year embargo period. Read more about the initiative here.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.
The Trump administration’s latest budget request proposes canceling federal subscriptions to academic journals and banning the use of federal funds to cover publishing costs.